Copanlisib population pharmacokinetics from phase I-III studies and exposure-response relationships in combination with rituximab.

Copanlisib dose selection was established under the maximum tolerated dose paradigm, and no dedicated dose-finding studies have investigated copanlisib dose selection when used in combination with rituximab. In CHRONOS-3, copanlisib plus rituximab demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). We conducted a comprehensive investigation of copanlisib population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) from a pooled analysis of 712 patients across nine copanlisib phase I-III studies and exposure-response (ER) relationships for efficacy and safety from the 1-year follow-up of CHRONOS-3. PopPK analyses examined the impact of demographic, laboratory, and comedication covariates on copanlisib between-patient PK variability. Individual static and time-varying exposure estimates were derived to investigate exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analyses examined ER relationships with consideration of predefined potentially prognostic demographic-, laboratory-, and/or disease-related baseline covariates. Copanlisib PK were best described by a three-compartment model with first-order elimination. Individual identified covariates had modest effects on copanlisib PK and were generally in line with known copanlisib disposition properties. In CHRONOS-3, ER analyses showed a significant relationship between time-varying exposure estimates and progression-free survival, and no significant exposure-safety relationships. Thus, lower copanlisib doses may result in reduced efficacy but not necessarily improved safety or tolerability. These outcomes substantiate the current intermittent dosing regimen of copanlisib 60 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and support the observed clinical results of copanlisib in combination with rituximab in the iNHL population.

Predicting menstrual bleeding patterns with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems.

PURPOSE: To develop a bleeding-pattern prediction model to inform counselling on amount and regularity of bleeding after levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fixed-cluster and regression-tree models were developed using bleeding data pooled from two clinical trials of LNG-IUSs. Models were trained and cross-validated on LNG-IUS 12 data, then applied to LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. Three clusters were generated for the fixed-cluster model: predominantly amenorrhoea; predominantly spotting; and predominantly bleeding. A random-forest model predicted the future-bleeding cluster, then the probability of cycle regularity was calculated. In the regression-tree model, women were assigned by the model to less- or more-bleeding groups. RESULTS: With LNG-IUS 12 (n = 1351) in the fixed-cluster model, 70.4% of women were correctly classified. The correct classification rates for LNG-IUS 20 (n = 216) and LNG-IUS 8 (n = 1300) were 72.2% and 69.0%. The probability distribution for cycle regularity showed regular and irregular bleeding were best separated with LNG-IUS 12 data, and less well with LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 8 data. In the regression-tree model there was high variability in the more- and less-bleeding group distributions with LNG-IUS 12 data. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-cluster model predicted bleeding patterns better than a regression-tree model in women using LNG-IUS, yielding understandable, informative output.

Insertion experience of women and health care professionals in the Kyleena® Satisfaction Study.

Purpose: The Kyleena® Satisfaction Study (KYSS) is a prospective, observational study conducted to assess satisfaction with LNG-IUS 12 (Kyleena®) in clinical practice and aims to provide adequate information for counselling women on what to expect regarding insertion and satisfaction.Materials and methods: Women deciding to use LNG-IUS 12 during routine counselling were informed of the study and provided informed consent. A baseline analysis was conducted to evaluate demographics, ease of insertion assessed by investigators, pain at insertion rated by women, additional interventions for insertion, and adverse events.Results: 1,110 women (536 parous, 574 nulliparous) had an insertion attempt and were included. Insertion was rated as easy in 494 (92.2%) parous and 516 (89.9%) nulliparous women. Pain was assessed as none or mild by 475 (88.6%) parous and 387 (67.4%) nulliparous women. Additional interventions were not required for most insertions (705; 63.6%). Overall 111 (10.0%) women reported adverse events at the time of baseline analysis.Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that LNG-IUS 12 insertion is easy and associated with no or mild pain in most women. Additional interventions for insertion are not required in most cases. After 3 months, the number of adverse events is low.Implications: The present baseline analysis of the Kyleena® Satisfaction Study (KYSS) demonstrates that most women rate insertion pain of LNG-IUS 12 as none or mild and clinicians consider insertion easy in the majority of cases.

Bleeding patterns with the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS, with special focus on the first year of use: implications for counselling.

Objective: The aim of the study was to provide an additional, detailed description of early bleeding patterns with the 19.5 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of the bleeding diaries of participants in a previously reported phase II randomised controlled study (n = 741) and a phase III study (n = 2904), with 2-year extension phase (n = 707), of the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS. Main outcome measures were the median number of bleeding and/or spotting days per 30-day reference period for 12 months and the influence of the previous contraceptive method and levonorgestrel dose on bleeding patterns. Results: The pooled analysis comprised 1697 women. There was a progressive decline in the number of bleeding and/or spotting days from month 1: the proportion of women with ≤4 bleeding and/or spotting days per month increased from 6.2% in month 1 to 15.8% in month 2, 26.0% in month 3, 39.3% in month 6 and 54.1% in month 12. The median number of bleeding and/or spotting days in month 1 was lowest in women who had previously been using an LNG-IUS. Conclusion: Analysis of bleeding diaries using 30-day reference periods provides detailed insight into bleeding changes in the first months following placement of the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS. This insight may prove useful when counselling women about contraceptive choice and method continuation.